September 13, 2011
The crucial Perry-Romney exchange on Social Security at last night's Tea Party Debate
ROMNEY: "But the real question is does Governor Perry continue to believe that Social Security should not be a federal program, that it's unconstitutional and it should be returned to the states or is he going to retreat from that view?"
CNN'S WOLF BLITZER: "Let's let Governor Perry respond. You have 30 seconds."
PERRY: "If what you're trying to say is that back in the '30s and the '40s that the federal government made all the right decision, I disagree with you. And it's time for us to get back to the constitution and a program that's been there 70 or 80 years, obviously we're not going to take that program away. But for people to stand up and support what they did in the '30s or what they're doing in the 2010s is not appropriate for America."
ROMNEY: "But the question is, do you still believe that Social Security should be ended as a federal program as you did six months ago when your book came out and returned to the states or do you want to retreat from that?"
PERRY: "I think we ought to have a conversation."
ROMNEY: "We're having that right now, governor. We're running for president."
PERRY: "And I'll finish this conversation. But the issue is, are there ways to move the states into Social Security for state employees or for retirees? We did in the state of Texas back in the 1980s. I think those types of thoughtful conversations with America, rather than trying to scare seniors like you're doing and other people, it's time to have a legitimate conversation in this country about how to fix that program where it's not bankrupt and our children actually know that there's going to be a retirement program there for them."
ROMNEY: "Governor, the term ponzi scheme is what scared seniors, number one. And number two, suggesting that Social Security should no longer be a federal program and returned to the states and unconstitutional is likewise frightening."
  1. theirvinefineline reblogged this from dcdecoder
  2. fatqueernerd reblogged this from socialistexan
  3. halfcentonline reblogged this from sarahlee310
  4. dokhtar reblogged this from dcdecoder
  5. weallhateporter reblogged this from sickeninglyliberal
  6. tarasr reblogged this from dcdecoder
  7. tumbledoresbeard reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  8. waltzmixer reblogged this from sickeninglyliberal and added:
    Holy shit, Mittens made sense.
  9. tandemtricycle reblogged this from sickeninglyliberal
  10. sickeninglyliberal reblogged this from dcdecoder
  11. honest-thoughts reblogged this from dcdecoder
  12. ramblingsofadreamcatcher reblogged this from politicksasusual
  13. reasonedoverreaction reblogged this from letterstomycountry
  14. wybehr reblogged this from dcdecoder
  15. sarahlee310 reblogged this from letterstomycountry
  16. politicksasusual reblogged this from dcdecoder and added:
    Romney nailed this for me...more of my thoughts later :)
  17. toholdtheworldinmyhands reblogged this from dcdecoder
  18. politicancer reblogged this from socialistexan
  19. sonicbloom11 reblogged this from dcdecoder
  20. officialmittromney reblogged this from sheercalculatedsilliness
  21. This was featured in #Politics
  22. sheercalculatedsilliness reblogged this from dcdecoder
  23. laa-peste reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  24. fancyscrubs reblogged this from dcdecoder
  25. letterstomycountry reblogged this from dcdecoder
  26. oncewaslost-neverwasfound reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president